Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription

Subscribe

Would you like to receive list emails batched into one daily digest?
No Yes
Modify Your Subscription

Modify

Home > List Archives

Occam's razor (Was: Where's the haemorrhage?)

Rowley Cottingham trauma-list@trauma.org
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 19:12:48 +0100


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C26A47.D26D5CC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can I remind you of Hanlon's razor? "Never attribute to malice that
which can adequately be explained by stupidity?"
=20
Often more useful.

-----Original Message-----
From: trauma-list-admin@trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-admin@trauma.org]
On Behalf Of DocRickFry@aol.com
Sent: 02 October 2002 11:07
To: trauma-list@trauma.org
Subject: Re: Occam's razor (Was: Where's the haemorrhage?)


In a message dated 10/1/2002 10:37:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
jmeade@statdoc.com writes:




The commonly accepted definition of Occam=92s Razor is that one should =
not
increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to
explain anything. In other words, if one disease entity explains the
symptom complex, don=92t dream up two diseases that happen to coexist.





Occam's razor is, in fact, exactly what Occam said--
"The simplest explanation for an event is usually the correct one"
Your elaboration above is certainly a good explanation of that tenet,
ERF=20


------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C26A47.D26D5CC0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3DWindows-1252">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>

<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D800231118-02102002><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Can I=20
remind you of Hanlon's razor? "Never attribute to malice that which can=20
adequately be explained by stupidity?"</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D800231118-02102002><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D800231118-02102002><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Often=20
more useful.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV></DIV>
  <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader lang=3Den-us dir=3Dltr =
align=3Dleft><FONT=20
  face=3DTahoma size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
  trauma-list-admin@trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-admin@trauma.org] =
<B>On=20
  Behalf Of </B>DocRickFry@aol.com<BR><B>Sent:</B> 02 October 2002=20
  11:07<BR><B>To:</B> trauma-list@trauma.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: =
Occam's=20
  razor (Was: Where's the haemorrhage?)<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><FONT=20
  face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT lang=3D0 face=3DArial size=3D2 =
FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF">In a=20
  message dated 10/1/2002 10:37:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, =
jmeade@statdoc.com=20
  writes:<BR><BR><BR></FONT><FONT lang=3D0 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: =
#ffffff"=20
  face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D3 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF">
  <BLOCKQUOTE=20
  style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px =
solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"=20
  TYPE=3D"CITE">The commonly accepted definition of Occam=92s Razor is =
that one=20
    should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of =
entities=20
    required to explain anything. In other words, if one disease entity =
explains=20
    the symptom complex, don=92t dream up two diseases that happen to=20
    coexist.<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></FONT><FONT lang=3D0=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 =
size=3D2=20
  FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF"><BR>Occam's razor is, in fact, exactly what Occam =

  said--<BR>"The simplest explanation for an event is usually the =
correct=20
  one"<BR>Your elaboration above is certainly a good explanation of that =

  tenet,<BR>ERF</FONT> </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C26A47.D26D5CC0--