Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Consider this Case Study
Terry Dinerman trauma-list@trauma.orgWed, 5 Jun 2002 21:33:26 -0700
- Previous message: Consider this Case Study
- Next message: Getting the best out of your team.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C20CD8.A09231C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Doc,=20 Thanks for taking the time to cite a couple of studies and give = additional illumination on this subject. I shall look up your = citations, but your common sense rings through without the need for = them, really. I cannot agree more fully with you, that a thorough head to toe, = physical exam is far more important than all the "Bells and Whistles" = put together. I get the best clinical picture of my patient as time = will allow and armed with that data, make my treatment and transport = decisions. Where patient assessment is concerned, I am practicing much the same = set of basic skills I learned when I sat for my first class, back in the = days of Cadillac ambulances and funeral home ambulance operators. I = have added a lot of nuances over the years, based on the thousands of = cases I've attended. But the basics remain the same. You are absolutely, beyond debate, correct. However, one thing that I can't avoid is the fact that when the Ortho = guy came by to do his assessment on the "Midnight Biker", he pulled the = ER's vintage Doppler out of the drawer and poked around as well! Oh = my..... If I should find myself in YOUR ER, and I allow the pull of the = Techno-Goodies to get the better of me, please make me do 10 laps around = the parking lot in MAST trousers, hauling a Pressure / Demand ventilator = with me while reciting my ABC's....... Thanks again! Terry Dinerman EMTP ----- Original Message -----=20 From: DocRickFry@aol.com=20 To: trauma-list@trauma.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:22 PM Subject: Re: Consider this Case Study In a message dated 6/5/2002 7:28:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, = dinerman@computron.net writes:=20 Since the Pt was transferred to definitive care, and the fracture = successfully reduced with circulation restored, I feel the man was = properly treated. But if what you say is true, could I be held = criminally or civilly liable for the use of a non-invasive tertiary = examination instrument, even if the treatment works to the favor of the = Patient? I decided that the local ER was ill equipped for open = reductions and vascular surgery, and the ER Doc was in agreement. =20 Terry--=20 No, this is not what I said--read what was written, not what you want = to see..IF you missed a vascualr injury based on your incorrect = assessment of Doppler signals, you could be liable--I said--you lucked = out here. In the end, in fact, your assessment of a warm hand with flow = did lead to the correct assessment of not that great an urgency, and you = did realize the need for definitive care--no problem there. You just = need to realize the Doppler did not add to that--you're seeing it as too = much of a crutch--learn to trust what you see and feel more, without = feeling like you need a positive test to give you permission to make a = clinical decision, and you will, as I said, be ahead of many physicians = of the "modern" age=20 Try Dennis et al, J Trauma Feb 1998, Frykberg ER, Surgical Clinics of = North America, April 1995.=20 ERF=20 ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C20CD8.A09231C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Doc, </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Thanks for taking the time to cite a = couple of=20 studies and give additional illumination on this subject. I shall = look up=20 your citations, but your common sense rings through without the = need for=20 them, really.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">I cannot agree more fully with you, = that a=20 thorough head to toe, physical exam is far more important than all the = "Bells=20 and Whistles" put together. I get the best clinical picture of my = patient=20 as time will allow and armed with that data, make my treatment and=20 transport decisions.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Where patient assessment is = concerned, I=20 am practicing much the same set of basic skills I learned when I sat for = my=20 first class, back in the days of Cadillac ambulances and funeral home = ambulance=20 operators. I have added a lot of nuances over the years, based on = the=20 thousands of cases I've attended. But the basics remain the = same.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">You are absolutely, beyond debate,=20 correct.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">However, one thing that I can't avoid = is the=20 fact that when the Ortho guy came by to do his assessment on the = "Midnight=20 Biker", he pulled the ER's vintage Doppler out of the drawer and poked = around as=20 well! Oh my.....</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">If I should find myself = in <U>YOUR</U>=20 ER, and I allow the pull of the Techno-Goodies to get the = better of=20 me, please make me do 10 laps around the parking lot in MAST trousers, = hauling a=20 Pressure / Demand ventilator with me while reciting my = ABC's.......</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Thanks again!</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Terry Dinerman EMTP</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3DDocRickFry@aol.com=20 href=3D"mailto:DocRickFry@aol.com">DocRickFry@aol.com</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dtrauma-list@trauma.org=20 href=3D"mailto:trauma-list@trauma.org">trauma-list@trauma.org</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, June 05, 2002 = 6:22=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Consider this Case = Study</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT lang=3D0 = face=3DArial size=3D2=20 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF">In a message dated 6/5/2002 7:28:33 PM Eastern = Standard=20 Time, <A = href=3D"mailto:dinerman@computron.net">dinerman@computron.net</A>=20 writes: <BR><BR><BR></FONT><FONT lang=3D0 face=3D"Comic Sans MS" = color=3D#000000=20 size=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SCRIPT"> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px = solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"=20 TYPE=3D"CITE">Since the Pt was transferred to definitive care, and the = fracture successfully reduced with circulation restored, I feel the = man was=20 properly treated. But if what you say is true, could I be held = criminally or civilly liable for the use of a non-invasive tertiary=20 examination instrument, even if the treatment works to the favor of = the=20 Patient? I decided that the local ER was ill equipped for open = reductions and vascular surgery, and the ER Doc was in agreement. = =20 <BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></FONT><FONT lang=3D0 face=3DArial = color=3D#000000 size=3D2=20 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF"><BR>Terry-- <BR>No, this is not what I said--read = what was=20 written, not what you want to see..IF you missed a vascualr injury = based on=20 your incorrect assessment of Doppler signals, you could be liable--I = said--you=20 lucked out here. In the end, in fact, your assessment of a warm = hand=20 with flow did lead to the correct assessment of not that great an = urgency, and=20 you did realize the need for definitive care--no problem there. = You just=20 need to realize the Doppler did not add to that--you're seeing it as = too much=20 of a crutch--learn to trust what you see and feel more, without = feeling like=20 you need a positive test to give you permission to make a clinical = decision,=20 and you will, as I said, be ahead of many physicians of the "modern" = age=20 <BR>Try Dennis et al, J Trauma Feb 1998, Frykberg ER, Surgical Clinics = of=20 North America, April 1995. <BR>ERF</FONT> = </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C20CD8.A09231C0--
- Previous message: Consider this Case Study
- Next message: Getting the best out of your team.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
