Login
Site Search
Trauma-List Subscription
Modify Your Subscription
Home >
List Archives
Consider this Case Study
Terry Dinerman trauma-list@trauma.orgWed, 5 Jun 2002 14:29:07 -0700
- Previous message: Consider this Case Study
- Next message: Consider this Case Study
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C20C9D.59B7ED20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Doc- Perhaps you miss my point - Could management of a warm limb distal to a serious angulated, closed = fracture with no pulse - With signs of collateral circulation (strong = Doppler tones) benefit from ER splinting and x-ray prior to transfer to = more definitive surgical care, or should I put every pulse-less limb on = an aircraft? I decided that since the limb appeared to be perfused to some degree, = that I would transport to the local ER first. Plaster splint, x-rays = and more analgesia accompanied this patient to a specialty orthopedic = hospital since my suspicion of severe potential vascular compromise was = confirmed by the ER Doc, and a team would be waiting for the Pt at the = other end by the time the patient arrived, ready to start the reduction. NO- Doppler is not a panacea. But it has a place in the decision making = tree even for us po' boys at the street level. After a good old = fashioned physical exam. The pain, MOI, lack of mobility, tingling at = the fingertips, lack of pulse and slowed cap refill where more than = enough to convince me this guy had problems. Not to mention that extra = elbow. I do however welcome your offer of data, pro or con. Teach me, for once = having been admonished, I wish to learn from you. Since the Pt was transferred to definitive care, and the fracture = successfully reduced with circulation restored, I feel the man was = properly treated. But if what you say is true, could I be held = criminally or civilly liable for the use of a non-invasive tertiary = examination instrument, even if the treatment works to the favor of the = Patient? I decided that the local ER was ill equipped for open = reductions and vascular surgery, and the ER Doc was in agreement. =20 How else would you attack the treatment of this patient, were you in a = court-room? =20 Contact me off-list if you like at: dinerman@computron.net=20 Regards- Terry Dinerman EMTP =20 ps - My MAST made nice water wings -------- ----- Original Message -----=20 From: DocRickFry@aol.com=20 To: trauma-list@trauma.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:54 PM Subject: Re: Consider this Case Study Terry Dinerman-- Shades of MAST trousers and spinal steroids! Whoa just one minute. You should become at least passing acquainted with the literature on = Dopplers in assessing for extrremity vascular injury--you have a serious = misunderstanding of its proven value and role! Please let me know if = you would like any of the volumes of refs on this? It may interest you to know that Doppler flow does not at all exclude = a vascular injury in an injured extremity--apparently you are under the = misapprehension that it does. Did you realize that Doppler flow can be = present distal to a completely transected or occluded vessel? = Collaterals will be picked up by Doppler--but an absent pulse is a known = hard sign of vascular injury that is well established as highly = accurate--its absence in itself mandates immediate evaluation--following = blunt trauma by arteriogram, follwoing penetrating trauma by direct = operation. This is again old and well established data. The fact you = appear to have gotten away with it in this presented case should NOT = positively reinforce you--the simple phys exam is superior to any = noninvasive testing for this purpose--and noninvasives have never yet = been shown to have any benefit over and above the phys presence or = absence of hard signs (absent pulse being only one of the five hard = signs). Don;t waste your money on these devices--and please, don't = endanger your license by using it with your present level of = understanding of its validity. As an expert witness, I would do you = in.... ERF -- trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG To change your settings or unsubscribe visit: http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C20C9D.59B7ED20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Doc-</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Perhaps you miss my point = -</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Could management of a warm limb = distal to a=20 serious angulated, closed fracture with no pulse - With signs of = collateral=20 circulation (strong Doppler tones) benefit from ER splinting and = x-ray=20 prior to transfer to more definitive surgical care, </FONT><FONT=20 face=3D"Comic Sans MS">or should I put every pulse-less limb on an=20 aircraft?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">I decided that since the limb appeared = to be=20 perfused to some degree, that I would transport to the local ER = first. =20 Plaster splint, x-rays and more analgesia accompanied this patient to a=20 specialty orthopedic hospital since my suspicion of severe potential = vascular=20 compromise was confirmed by the ER Doc, and a team would be waiting for = the Pt=20 at the other end by the time the patient arrived, ready to start the=20 reduction.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">NO- Doppler is not a panacea. = But it has a=20 place in the decision making tree even for us po' boys at the street=20 level. <U>After</U> a good old fashioned physical exam. The = pain,=20 MOI, lack of mobility, tingling at the fingertips, lack of pulse and = slowed cap=20 refill where more than enough to convince me this guy had = problems. Not to=20 mention that extra elbow.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">I do however welcome your offer = of data,=20 pro or con. <U>Teach me,</U> for once having been admonished, I = wish=20 to learn from you.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Since the Pt was transferred to=20 definitive care, and the fracture successfully reduced with = circulation=20 restored, I feel the man was properly treated. But if what you say = is=20 true, could I be held criminally or civilly liable for the use of a = non-invasive=20 tertiary examination instrument, even if the treatment works = to the=20 favor of the Patient? I decided that the local ER was ill equipped = for=20 open reductions and vascular surgery, and the ER Doc was in = agreement. =20 </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">How else would you attack the = treatment of this=20 patient, were you in a court-room? </FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Contact me off-list if = you like=20 at: <A = href=3D"mailto:dinerman@computron.net">dinerman@computron.net</A>=20 </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Regards-</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Terry Dinerman EMTP</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"> </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">ps - My MAST made nice water wings=20 --------</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman">----- Original Message ----- = </FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3DDocRickFry@aol.com=20 href=3D"mailto:DocRickFry@aol.com">DocRickFry@aol.com</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dtrauma-list@trauma.org=20 href=3D"mailto:trauma-list@trauma.org">trauma-list@trauma.org</A> = </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, June 05, 2002 = 12:54=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Consider this Case = Study</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV><BR>Terry Dinerman--<BR>Shades of MAST trousers and = spinal=20 steroids!<BR>Whoa just one minute.<BR>You should become at least = passing=20 acquainted with the literature on Dopplers in assessing for extrremity = vascular injury--you have a serious misunderstanding of its proven = value and=20 role! Please let me know if you would like any of the volumes of = refs on=20 this?<BR>It may interest you to know that Doppler flow does not at all = exclude=20 a vascular injury in an injured extremity--apparently you are under = the=20 misapprehension that it does. Did you realize that Doppler flow = can be=20 present distal to a completely transected or occluded vessel? =20 Collaterals will be picked up by Doppler--but an absent pulse is a = known hard=20 sign of vascular injury that is well established as highly = accurate--its=20 absence in itself mandates immediate evaluation--following blunt = trauma by=20 arteriogram, follwoing penetrating trauma by direct operation. = This is=20 again old and well established data. The fact you appear to have = gotten=20 away with it in this presented case should NOT positively reinforce = you--the=20 simple phys exam is superior to any noninvasive testing for this = purpose--and=20 noninvasives have never yet been shown to have any benefit over and = above the=20 phys presence or absence of hard signs (absent pulse being only one of = the=20 five hard signs). Don;t waste your money on these devices--and = please,=20 don't endanger your license by using it with your present level of=20 understanding of its validity. As an expert witness, I would do = you=20 in....<BR>ERF<BR><BR><BR>--<BR>trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG<BR>To change = your=20 settings or unsubscribe visit:<BR><A=20 = href=http://www.trauma.org/index.php/community/list/url/http:list.ftech.net/pipermail/trauma-list/2002-June/3D"http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html">http://www.trauma.org/trau= malist.html</A><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C20C9D.59B7ED20--
- Previous message: Consider this Case Study
- Next message: Consider this Case Study
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
