External Fixation
There is little evidence to support the use of the external fixator (over noninvasive stabilization) in the control of haemorrhage. No prospective, randomized trials have been conducted. There is sufficient level 2 evidence to conclude that some method of stabilizing the pelvis is useful initially, but no evidence to differentiate between simple sheet wraps, the anterior eternal fixator or the posterior (Ganz) clamp. Haemorrhage after pelvic injury is from fracture surfaces, venous plexuses and major arteries, usually branches of the internal iliac artery (hypogastric artery). Depending on patient selection and injury characteristics, studies report the incidence of arterial injury requiring angiographic embolization as being up to 33.3%. Stabilization of the pelvis will help control bleeding from bony surfaces and venous bleeding, but not arterial haemorrhage. These rapients rapidly become cold and coagulopathic. Early stabilisation of the pelvis allows clot to form while clotting mechanisms are still intact. However the external fixator will only adequately control a rotationally unstable pelvis, and may worsen a posterior injury. The ideal method of emergent pelvic stabilization is not clear, and depends to some extent on the fracture pattern. However there are complications associated with external fixation. Application may take some time, especially with more complex pelvic injuries. The frame can interfere with subsequent laparotomy and pin site sepsis can preclude definitive open reduction & internal fixation of pelvic and anterior column acetabular fractures. Ultimately the decision whether to apply an external fixator depends on the systems and personnel in place at an institution, the spectrum of staff available who are skilled in the application of external fixation versus interventioal radiologists and trauma surgeons. Evidence Waikakul S; Harnroongroj T; Vanadurongwan V To compare the immediate and long term outcome of immediate stabilization of the unstable pelvic fractures to delayed stabilization with simple external fixation, the study was carried out as a paralell trial with 2 year follow-up. There were 112 patients with 69 males and 43 females who had unstable pelvic fractures. They were allocated randomly into 2 groups. In group 1, 40 patients, conventional management was performed while in group 2, 72 patients, reduction and anterior stabilization of pelvic fractures with a simple external fixator were carried out immediately just after the unstable fractures were detected. Blood transfusion, post operative pain, need of reconstructive surgery of the pelvic fractures and late deformities were less in the group 2. Immediate anterior reduction and stabilization of the unstable pelvic fractures gave encouraging results. Level IIa Bassam, D., G. A. Cephas, et al Design: Prospective Cohort Study Comments: Non-randomised, small study. However no patient undergoing emergent angiography required a second intervention to control bleeding, compared to 50% of the external fixation group, who went on to angiography. Also massive thigh/buttock/flank haematomas seen in the ex-fix group. Grimm MR, Vrahas MS, Thomas KA
Design: Cadaveric Model Ghanayem AJ, Wilber JH, Lieberman JM, Motta AO Design: Cadaveric Model Comment: Advocates closing the pelvic volume without determining the effect this has on haemorrhage. Does not support the external fixator over other methods of pelvic fixation. Simonian PT, Routt ML Jr, Harrington RM, Tencer AF Design: Cadaveric Model Moss MC; Bircher M Fractures of the pelvis are not only common but are very varied in their complexity. They represent 3% of all fractures (1), they account for 1 in every 1000 surgical admissions and are the third most commonly encountered injury in motor vehicle accident fatalities (2). However, only a small percentage of all pelvic fractures are associated with major disruption of the pelvic ring (3). Life threatening haemorrhage is a frequent complication of major pelvic fractures (1, 4) and haemorrhage is the leading cause of death in these patients (5, 6). It was believed that fracture and subsequent displacement of the ring greatly increased pelvic volume. However, clinical practice seemed to indicate that this might not be true. This study aimed to assess the change in pelvic volume which occurs in severely displaced pelvic fractures. A model of the bony pelvis was designed to permit extreme displacements of the symphyseal and sacroiliac joints. The volume of a polythene balloon placed within the true pelvis was measured as an indication of true pelvic volume. Our finding was that the increase in the volume of the true pelvis which occurs in a fracture with massive diastasis is much smaller than previously assumed. Ghanayem AJ; Stover MD; Goldstein
JA; Bellon E; Wilber JH The emergent care of an unstable pelvic ring disruption in the patient who is hemodynamically unstable includes rapid application of military antishock trousers or an external fixator in an attempt to control bleeding and hemodynamically stabilize the patient. However, use of the military antishock trousers is limited in that it restricts access to the abdomen and lower extremities. The external fixator is limited at many institutions by the need to apply it in the operating room. Two experimental devices have been developed to provide emergent pelvic fracture reduction and temporary stabilization in the trauma room, while maintaining access to the abdomen and lower extremities. This study compared the efficacy of pelvic fracture reduction and stabilization in a cadaveric model using an external fixator with the efficacy of 2 experimental devices, the pelvic stabilizer and the pelvic c-clamp. Based on their ability to restore pelvic volume and reduce pubic diastasis and their application time, the 3 devices performed similarly. Complications in applying each device were noted but were of less clinical significance for the external fixator. Surgeon practice on cadavera before clinical use will help ensure safe application of either experimental device in the trauma room. Kyle F. Dickson; Joel M. Matta,
MD The clinical observation of a flexed and internally
rotated hemipelvis in patients with an unstable pelvis who were treated
with an anterior external fixator prompted this study. Using three-dimensional
measuring techniques, the authors reviewed the radiographs of pre- and
post-external fixator placement in the referred patients with an initial
hemodynamic and mechanically unstable pelvis. The authors found
67% of the patients had worsening of the deformity posteriorly.
The most frequent deformities of the hemipelvis were cephalad and posterior
translation, internal rotation, and flexion. An equal number of abduction
and adduction deformities existed. Worsening of the external fixation
deformity occurred in 73% of the patients. All cases had a maximum measurement
of displacement greater than 1 cm (average 3 cm; range: 1.5 cm to 5.4
cm) after placement of an external fixator. Level III Riemer B, Butterfield SL, Diamond DL, Young JC et
al Design: Retrospective Review Comments: There is no indication about how often the application of an external fixator restored blood pressure. Also no indication as to the use of angiographic embolization over this time period. Moreno C, Moore EE, Rosenberger A, Cleveland HC Design: Retrospective Review Comments: Retrospective study that fails to adequately describe management of injury according to fracture pattern. Management protocol does not utilise angiography after laparotomy to control retroperitoneal haematoma. Hupel TM, McKee MD, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH Design: Retrospective Review Comment: Overall there was a 16.7% failure rate with external fixation, rising to 46% when studying pure open-book injuries. Gylling SF, WR, Holcroft JW, Bray TJ, Chapman MW Design: Retrospective Review Comments: Although mortality in the two groups was similar, the results do not adequately support the conclusion. Authors themselves comment in the discussion: 'The avergae high transfusion requirement in the unstable group suggests that the external fixator did not limit haemorrhage'. Guide to Evidence Appraisals The definitions of the types of evidence and the grading of recommendations used originate from the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
|
|||||||||||||||||