|
|
| |
Trauma in Pregnancy
|
|
Date:
Sat, 6 Jul 1996 14:41:54
From: Teodoro J. Herbosa [therbosa@kulog.upm.edu.ph]
I'm interested in information on Trauma in Pregnancy. Anyone in
the list with information (data) would be most welcome.
What I want to know is how often do you see such cases in your
center. I'm particularly interested in cases with abdominal trauma
in pregnancy who undergo laparotomy in their late trimester.
|
|
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 05:08:30
From: Evelyn Cardenas MD [Emjogger@aol.com]
I read your post regarding a request for information regarding
trauma in pregnancy. While I do not have specific information to
tell you that is different from basic trauma protocol, I do have
some comments regarding the use of ultrasound in the ED. Trauma
in pregnancy is one of the many reasons, I and other Emergency Medicine
MDs are advocating having the skill to use an ultrasound machine
in the eval of blunt trauma. Having the skill to do a quick scan
of the abdomen for fluid would allow one to make quick management
decisions. It also allows for a quick assessment of fetal viability
and position. I think that ultrasound to assess for hemoperitoneum
would be a better/easier imaging modality in blunt trauma in pregnancy.(this
is my opinion)
Are the surgeons and emergency physicians using ultrasound in
your department?
|
|
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 17:57:06
From: Teodoro J. Herbosa [therbosa@kulog.upm.edu.ph]
Surgeons in our deparment are now being trained to do intraoperative
ultrasoung specifically for hepatobiliary surgery. Because of this
exposure, they now utilize the ultrasound for some preoperative diagnostic
techniques most specifically diagnosing hemoperitoneum in abdominal
trauma.
Our Ob-Gyne residents as wel are proficient in ultrasound of the
pelvis. However I find the the skills for these tests have beeen fragmented.
I've read articles from German and Japanese institutions that use
the ulltrasound like the stetoscope, I however think that the resistance
of some sonologists is giving this turf may also have some valid claims.
Anecdotically, I've seen OB-GYN residents misdiagnose a pancreatic
cyst as a huge Ovarian cyst.
Emergency Physicians are still not using ultrasound in our institution.
I believe that this will greatly improve the diagnosis in the ED specially
in traumatized pregnant patient.
I had however wanted specifically more data are the epidemiology
of trauma in pregnant patient from the different subscribers. I wanted
to know the frequent causes of trauma and outcomes of treatment (laparotomy)
in terms of Maternal mortality and morbidity and fetal mortality and
morbidity.
Thank you for your very quick response.
|
|
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 1996 19:54:23
From: Bradley K. Mosiman [wmosiman@feist.com]
Only the surgeons are credentialled to use ultrasound in the resuscitation
room for the evaluation of blunt trauma at our facility. None of
them feel totally comfortable using US to determine viability, etc
of fetus. Generally the OB surgeon is called in. We have had great
success with US, have decreased the number of CT scans needed, and
have an opportunity to do easy serial exams if necessary.
|
|
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 20:00:49
From: Dr David Ulyatt [dulyatt@medeserv.com.au]
There is a Valuable article in Annals of Surgery, May 1996: "
infant survival after Cesarean section for trauma" Morris et al
multicenter origin US.
8 yr retrospective survey of trauma adms level 1 trauma centers,
414 pregnant with 32 emergency C sections.
No surviving fetus without preop FHS, or > 26 weeks gest'n.
Fetal survival independent of maternal ISS!
Of 5 dead fetuses judged potentially salvageable all had delayed
recognition of foetal distress, and 60% of these mothers were ISS<
16!
There is more.
|
|
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 20:49:20
From: [MSaxena123@aol.com]
I am a emergency physian, work at a level 1 trauma center.We have
a very good trauma team organization etc., but unfortunately do
not have a good back-up of Ob. On calls Gyn. are very reluctant
to come and get involved even to evaluate pregnant trauma patients.
For severe trauma, there is not much problem as 'taking care of
mother will take care of fetus' dictim holds true.Problem arises
in mild to moderate trauma of MVA when mother is a little tender
in lower abdomen , and usually anxious to know whether the fetus
is OK? A one time doppler demonstration of adequate FHS ideally
should not be sufficient and monitoring of uterine contraction and
fetal heart is recommended.
Is this how it is usually practised in other institutions? I would
like to know from others.
We usually have to transfer our pregnant trauma patints to other
hospital with ob.facility. What are the indications for such monitoring?
Is it also indicated in early pregnancy?
I would appreciate different points of view. Thanks
|
|
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 04:32:54
From: Eric Frykberg M.D. [ERF.TRAUMAONE@mail.health.ufl.edu]
We are fortunate to have a responsive OB service, which I think
is as essential as is a committed ortho or neurosurgery service,
altho fortunately OB trauma is less common. OB immediately responds
to trauma in pregnant patients, and those intermediate patients
you are most concerned about, who are admitted for observation,
are admitted to the labor deck for monitoring, with trauma seeing
them in conjunction. OB is also involved in any laparotomy and post-op
monitoring, and is an important input for decisions as to the need
for C-section in late pregnancies.
|
|