| |
Clearing the Cervical Spine
in Unconscious Patients
|
|
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 23:15:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: [Livapate@aol.com]
Dear panel of
trauma goo-roo's,
how do y'all
clear your intubated, versed and morphine dripped, norcuron gomers
c-spines when they been radiographically cleared, but not clinically
cleared. keep in mind these patients are being resuscitated with
massive amounts of fluid. do u removed the c-collars with both
ct of the c-1 thru c-7 and plain xrays (negative) or do u keep
the collar on thru the dough boy metamorphism.
we've been keeping
the collars on until the pt is able to follow commands and thus
able to respond appropriately to the clinical questions. i believe
cook county hospital in chicago keeps the c-collar on until cleared
clinically. we're just curious to see what's going on in other
trauma centers.
I work at il
masonic med center in chicago. level one trauma.
please let me
know your protocol.
|
|
Date:
Sat, 13 Sep 1997 14:32:51 -0800
From: John B. Kortbeek [kortbeek@supernet.ab.ca]
We currently
do not routinely perform flex/ext views in comatose patients who
have no abnormality on conventional 3 views =/- CT. We are revisting
the literature in light of the spinal clearance algorythym published
at www.trauma.org as well as protocols at many other centers that
do require routine flex/ext views or c-collar until awake. Prolonged
maintenance in a c collar has it's own potential hazards including
difficult airway management and pressure sores. If anyone is aware
of a paper clearly examining risk/benefit expense ratios of routine
flex/ext views in comatose patients, could they please forward
the reference.
J.Kortbeek -
Calgary
|
|
Date:
Wed, 01 Oct 1997 21:02:54 +0100
From: Louise Beckham [louise.beckham@virgin.net]
How big a problem
are pressure sores caused by c-collars? It's not really something
I've experianced, but seems perfectly logical that a problem could
arise.
Louise (med.stud.)
|
|
Date:
03 Oct 97 08:30:05 EDT
From: Jean Proehl [Jean.Proehl@Hitchcock.org]
Some of these
pressure sores become big, gaping, nasty wounds that are difficult
to treat given their location. There are rigid collars that are
designed for prolonged use (Miami collar, etc). They have gel
padding in appropriate areas. They are more expensive but certainly
worth it for patients who need a rigid collar for a lengthy time.
However, I'd be willing to bet that you can have problems even
with these collars in some patients.
Jean Proehl
Emergency Clinical Nurse Specialist
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
|
|
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 1997 18:38:48 +0100
From: Dr. Ed Walker [Ed_trauma@limeland.demon.co.uk]
They certainly
can arise. You also have to remember to give regular pressure
care to the orthopod who's been sitting in front of the x-ray
viewer for hours trying to decide what to do about the neck.
It's nice to
see a student in the group. Don't be put off by the bickering.
People always say things in e-mails they wouldn't dare say face
to face. I mean Chris Taylor for instance. I bet he's really quite
a nice bloke....:)
|
|
Date:
Fri, 03 Oct 1997 15:44:20 -0400
From: Judy Halpern [ijtned@serv01.net-link.net]
Even one pressure
sore may be too many if it is in your patient. I can recall working
with a case in which the pressure sore (due to the collar) was
directly over the operative site and delayed surgical stabilization
of the spine. Collars intended for temporary use tend to be left
on longer than anticipated and unfortunately, produce complications.
Judy Halpern,
RN, MS
|
|
Date:
Mon, 06 Oct 1997 12:56:59 +0100
From: Louise Beckham [louise.beckham@virgin.net]
I recently had
to accompany a patient through a radiology department for a series
of C-spine X-rays. He had fallen down stairs after an alcohol
binge, kept having fits, and had been put in a hard collar for
a possible C-spine fracture.
I was given strict
instructions by the A&E nurse on how to ensure manual in-line
stabilisation and ‘not to move his neck as the consequences would
be my responsibility’.
So I was absolutely
petrified when the radiographer wanted to take the collar off,
straighten his neck (as it was slightly off centre) and get me
out of the way! I caused a bit of a scene by asking if I could
check with his doctor first, and everyone was held up while someone
found the casualty officer (as I wouldn’t let go of the patient’s
neck!).
The collar was
taken off, the neck moved back to the centre and the patient co-operated
with the X-rays. He was found not to have a C-spine fracture.
I’m still a little
confused as to what you can and cannot do in these situations.
It seems bizarre to have to move the C-spine in order to get it
into the position in which it can be radiologically cleared!
|
|
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 1997 22:39:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Charles Krin [Krin135@aol.com]
OK, I'll bite,
how come no tongs or halo type traction in these folks? My understanding
was that if cervical immobilization had to be on for more that
a couple of days in an ambulatory patient, then a Halo set with
shoulder braces was the way to go- like wise, cranial tongs for
the bed bound types- both have the advantages of providing skeletal
traction (which would decrease the amount of soft tissue pressure
areas) along with doing a better job of immobilizing the affected
joints than even the gel padded Philedelphia collars.
|
|
Date:
Sun, 05 Oct 1997 14:33:39 -0500
From: HD/Tanya [tanhugh@phoenix.lambuth.edu]
I think there
are probably more students lurking than you realize.
HD (pre-med student)
|
|
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 1997 23:21:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: [Livapate@aol.com]
the problem is
in the patient who is unable to tell you if they can move their
neck or have pain in their neck. the patient that is medically
sedated and paralyed, how do u cleard their necks? do u leave
the c-collar on until u give them a chemical holiday even though
neck films and ct of cervical vertebra r cleared?
|
|
Date:
Thu, 18 Sep 1997 15:45:36 +0100
From: Dr. Ed Walker [Ed_trauma@limeland.demon.co.uk]
I've just been
reading the suggested protocol on the trauma.org page. Do people
REALLY use flexion/extension views?
We are trying
to get together a formal policy for our dept., and while I go
along with the ideas that a cooperative, non-drunk, non-drugged
fully conscious patient with no neck pain and a normal clinical
exam. probably does not need radiology of any kind, shouldn't
there be a place in there somewhere for mechanism of injury, even
if they appear completely symptomless? Rugby players especially
round our way are renowned for their complete inability to feel
pain, and their remarkable ability to hold their C1s on their
C2s with no visible means of support.
|
|
Date:
Thu, 18 Sep 1997 18:26:47 +0200
From: Teddy Fagerström
Flexio/exstension
views do not have a place in the initial "pack" of x-rays. First
of all, if the patient has neck pain, his muscle contraction will
prevent movement of the spine to a degree that it will be a non
conclusive investigation. If no neck pain it will not add any
info.
I have however
had a few patients with cervical spine injury that have come the
hospital a week or so after trauma because of continous pain.
These patients had in two cases densfractures that needed treatment.
I also belive that neckpain could be masked by other injuries
with moore intense pain. I still take a lateral, AP and oblique
views at least before "clearing" the spine.
Teddy Fagerstrom,
MD
Dep of orthopedics and spine center
Linkoping Sweden
|
|
Date:
Fri, 3 Oct 1997 13:47:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Napoliello [Nappio@aol.com]
Using thin cuts
with our spiral CT scanner we pick up a larger number of occult
c-spine injuries
in patients whose x-rays are non-diagnostic. Although this has
greatly reduced the number of flexion/ext view x-rays, we still
pick up a few patients a year with ligamentous injury found only
on flex/ext who had normal initial x-rays and persistant c/o pain
which prompted the further study. Also notable is that we have
a number of c-spine injuries each year easily notable on on initial
surveillance 3 view x-rays in which the patient is completely
asymptomatic.
|