| 
In patients where there is clinical suspicion of injury without
overt signs, or clinical examination is impossible or unreliable
(unconscious, intoxicated, spinal cord injury) then other modalities
must be employed. The options are Computed Tomography (CT), Diagnostic
Peritoneal Lavage (DPL) and Laparoscopy. Neither diagnostic peritoneal
lavage nor laparoscopy will adequately evaluate the colon - especially
the retroperitoneal colon.
Computed Tomography
CT is rapidly becoming the investigation of choice for evaluating
blunt abdominal trauma in the haemodynamically normal patient.
Colonic injury is suggested by free extraluminal air, intra-peritoneal
or retro-pertioneal free fluid, focal thickening of the bowel
wall, bowel wall haematoma or intra-mural air. Scans should be
viewed on both abdominal and 'bone' windows to increase the sensitivity
for free air. The overall accuracy of CT for evaluating bowel
injury is 82%, with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of
97%. These figures may be improved with the use of triple-contrast
(IV, oral and rectal) although the use of oral and rectal contrast
is not universal. CT may also be useful in excluding peritoneal
violation and allowing early discharge rather than admission for
observation.
Rectal Injuries
A high index of suspicion for trauma is vital if injuries are
not to be missed. In blunt trauma, rectal injuries are most commonly
associated with pelvic fractures. Rectal examination should be
performed on all pelvic injuries, looking for blood and bone fragments
lacerating the rectal wall. If there is any doubt about the disagnosis,
rigid sigmoidoscopy should be performed. When identified early
and managed appropriately, open pelvic fractures have a mortality
approaching that of closed injuries. However, in the presence
of a missed rectal injury, the mortality may be as high as 50%.
Penetrating rectal injuries may be caused by injuries to the
abdomen, thigh or buttock, as in the case presented. Again, any
penetrating wound that may have injured the rectum should be fully
evaluated with digital examination and proctoscopy/sigmoidoscopy.
Even with these examinations it is possible to miss a significant
rectal injury.
|